Uncategorized

From the latest Frontline….

Add comment3 June 20101 min readby V.Venkatesan

*Bringing clarity on reservations: Why I think the recent judgments in the cases of Union of India v. Ramesh Ram and Dr.Krishnamurthy v. Union of India bring clarity to the affirmative action debate.
* Examining the new CJI’s views on PIL admission in the context of the recent cases.

Tagged asPublic Interest Litigation, Reservations

Facebook Twitter Reddit LinkedIn

Subscribe

0 Comments

Inline Feedbacks

View all comments

Section 104 BNS: Old Wine in a New Bottle?

4 March 2025by Abhishek Sanjay

Blurb: The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita’s Section 104 revives the constitutional infirmities of the repealed Section 303 IPC, despite its ostensible reformist intent. By maintaining mandatory sentencing...

Uncategorized

Examining The Issue Of South Asian Climate Refugees From The Lens Of Human Rights: India’s Policy In Focus Part II

16 February 2025by Abhishek Sanjay

Blurb: This blog discusses the inadequacy of the current refugee law framework in addressing the pressing issue of climate refugees. It subsequently discusses the imminent need to develop regional...

Uncategorized

Examining The Issue Of South Asian Climate Refugees From The Lens Of Human Rights: India’s Policy In Focus Part I

16 February 2025by Abhishek Sanjay

Blurb: This blog discusses the inadequacy of the current refugee law framework in addressing the pressing issue of climate refugees. It subsequently discusses the imminent need to develop regional...

Uncategorized

Harnessing Faith within Religion – A Critique of the Judicial Discourse around Fundamental Right to Freedom of Religion

12 February 2025by flyingstars.informatics@gmail.com

Blurb: The Essential Religious Practices (ERP) Test is scheduled to be reviewed by the Supreme Court of India. This piece highlights the inadequacies of the ERP Doctrine, and argues for a change...

Uncategorized

A Case For Euthanasia For Non-Terminally Ill Patients

6 February 2025by Abhishek Sanjay

Blurb: The article advocates extending euthanasia to non-terminally ill patients, emphasizing autonomy and dignity under Article 21. Critiquing current laws, it highlights ethical dilemmas and...

Uncategorized

Remembering Bhulabhai Desai and the INA Trials

26 January 2025by Baibhav Mishra

In this piece, the author revisits the legacy of Bhulabhai Desai and his masterful defense at the Indian National Army Trials of 1945, exploring how Bhulabhai’s arguments not only reframed the INA’s...

From the latest Frontline….

Further reading

Section 104 BNS: Old Wine in a New Bottle?

Examining The Issue Of South Asian Climate Refugees From The Lens Of Human Rights: India’s Policy In Focus Part II

Examining The Issue Of South Asian Climate Refugees From The Lens Of Human Rights: India’s Policy In Focus Part I

Harnessing Faith within Religion – A Critique of the Judicial Discourse around Fundamental Right to Freedom of Religion

A Case For Euthanasia For Non-Terminally Ill Patients

Remembering Bhulabhai Desai and the INA Trials

Menu