Uncategorized

From the latest Frontline….

Add comment3 June 20101 min readby V.Venkatesan

*Bringing clarity on reservations: Why I think the recent judgments in the cases of Union of India v. Ramesh Ram and Dr.Krishnamurthy v. Union of India bring clarity to the affirmative action debate.
* Examining the new CJI’s views on PIL admission in the context of the recent cases.

Tagged asPublic Interest Litigation, Reservations

Facebook X Reddit LinkedIn

Subscribe

0 Comments

Inline Feedbacks

View all comments

Explainer: The Consent Regime under DPDPA, 2023

20 July 2026by LAOT

This article examines India's Digital Personal Data Protection Act 2023, focusing on the adequacy of its consent-based framework as the primary mechanism for privacy protection. It discusses...

Uncategorized

Explainer: Vanashakti Judgment

3 July 2026by LAOT

This article examines the Supreme Court’s 2025 judgment on the Aravalli Hills and Ranges, focusing on the Court’s effort to resolve the long-standing definitional ambiguity surrounding the ecosystem...

Uncategorized

Unrecognised Status, Visible Struggles, Over-Arching Patriarchy: ASHA Workers and a Quest for Identity | Part 2

19 June 2026by LAOT

The article is divided into two parts. Part-I seeks to establish that ASHA workers fulfil conditions to be recognised as workman under the IRC. Part-II aims to show how the feminisation aspect...

Uncategorized

Unrecognised Status, Visible Struggles, Over-Arching Patriarchy: ASHA Workers and a Quest for Identity | Part – 1

19 June 2026by LAOT

The article is divided into two parts. Part-I seeks to establish that ASHA workers fulfil conditions to be recognised as workman under the IRC. Part-II aims to show how the feminisation aspect...

Uncategorized

Pregnant with Contradiction: Harmonising Reproductive Autonomy and the Right to Self Determination

5 June 2026by LAOT

Summary: The article analyses the case of Hari Devageeth v Union of India. It highlights the conflict faced by the court between two constitutional rights: a transgender man’s right to bodily...

Uncategorized

Panel 5: Beyond Judicial Conduct and Constitutional Accountability

5 June 2026by LAOT

Introduction The fifth panel highlighted the multi-faceted dimensions of behavioural accountability within the Indian Judicial system. Moving beyond the constitutional frameworks, the panelists...

From the latest Frontline….

Further reading

Explainer: The Consent Regime under DPDPA, 2023

Explainer: Vanashakti Judgment

Unrecognised Status, Visible Struggles, Over-Arching Patriarchy: ASHA Workers and a Quest for Identity | Part 2

Unrecognised Status, Visible Struggles, Over-Arching Patriarchy: ASHA Workers and a Quest for Identity | Part – 1

Pregnant with Contradiction: Harmonising Reproductive Autonomy and the Right to Self Determination

Panel 5: Beyond Judicial Conduct and Constitutional Accountability

Menu