Fundamental Rights – Law and Other Things

This post analyses the Supreme Court’s attempt to reconcile its dominant liberalism/individualism based approach towards fundamental rights as against the group right claims under Article 26, in the recent Sabarimala verdict.

In this post, Vivek Anandh thematically analyses the important doctrinal conclusions on the ‘Essential Practices’ test and its discursive impact on the constitutional jurisprudence in the context of the Sabarimala Judgment.

In this post, the authors argue that while the Navtej Johar judgment is tool for social change, it may be unable to function as an effective measure for social acceptance.

This post is the concluding part of a three part series deconstructing the Sabrimala Verdict which opened the gates of temple to women devotees.

This post is the second part of a three part series deconstructing the Sabarimala Verdict which opened the gates of temple to women devotees.

This post is the first part of a three part series deconstructing the Sabrimala Verdict which opened the gates of temple to women devotees.

The Aadhaar litigation will go down in history for being the second longest hearing in the Supreme Court of India. The case was heard for 38 days over a span of four months in which …

Category: Fundamental Rights

Sabarimala and the Essential Religious Practices Test

Social Dimensions Of Judicial Decisions: The Navtej Johar Template

Understanding the Sabarimala Verdict- Part II

Understanding the Sabarimala Verdict- Part I

All you need to know about the Aadhaar Litigation