Uncategorized

From the latest Frontline….

Add comment3 June 20101 min readby V.Venkatesan

*Bringing clarity on reservations: Why I think the recent judgments in the cases of Union of India v. Ramesh Ram and Dr.Krishnamurthy v. Union of India bring clarity to the affirmative action debate.
* Examining the new CJI’s views on PIL admission in the context of the recent cases.

Tagged asPublic Interest Litigation, Reservations

Facebook X Reddit LinkedIn

Subscribe

0 Comments

Inline Feedbacks

View all comments

Explainer: Vanashakti Judgment

3 July 2026by LAOT

This article examines the Supreme Court’s 2025 judgment on the Aravalli Hills and Ranges, focusing on the Court’s effort to resolve the long-standing definitional ambiguity surrounding the ecosystem...

Uncategorized

Unrecognised Status, Visible Struggles, Over-Arching Patriarchy: ASHA Workers and a Quest for Identity | Part 2

19 June 2026by LAOT

The article is divided into two parts. Part-I seeks to establish that ASHA workers fulfil conditions to be recognised as workman under the IRC. Part-II aims to show how the feminisation aspect...

Uncategorized

Unrecognised Status, Visible Struggles, Over-Arching Patriarchy: ASHA Workers and a Quest for Identity | Part – 1

19 June 2026by LAOT

The article is divided into two parts. Part-I seeks to establish that ASHA workers fulfil conditions to be recognised as workman under the IRC. Part-II aims to show how the feminisation aspect...

Uncategorized

Pregnant with Contradiction: Harmonising Reproductive Autonomy and the Right to Self Determination

5 June 2026by LAOT

Summary: The article analyses the case of Hari Devageeth v Union of India. It highlights the conflict faced by the court between two constitutional rights: a transgender man’s right to bodily...

Uncategorized

Panel 5: Beyond Judicial Conduct and Constitutional Accountability

5 June 2026by LAOT

Introduction The fifth panel highlighted the multi-faceted dimensions of behavioural accountability within the Indian Judicial system. Moving beyond the constitutional frameworks, the panelists...

Uncategorized

Panel 4: Adjudicating the Environmental Juristocracy: Judicial Evasion and the Crisis of the Rule of Law

5 June 2026by LAOT

Introduction This report summarises the panel discussion titled “Adjudicating the Environmental Juristocracy,” which examined the trajectory of environmental and animal law jurisprudence...

From the latest Frontline….

Further reading

Explainer: Vanashakti Judgment

Unrecognised Status, Visible Struggles, Over-Arching Patriarchy: ASHA Workers and a Quest for Identity | Part 2

Unrecognised Status, Visible Struggles, Over-Arching Patriarchy: ASHA Workers and a Quest for Identity | Part – 1

Pregnant with Contradiction: Harmonising Reproductive Autonomy and the Right to Self Determination

Panel 5: Beyond Judicial Conduct and Constitutional Accountability

Panel 4: Adjudicating the Environmental Juristocracy: Judicial Evasion and the Crisis of the Rule of Law

Menu