The Gujjar leaders’ acceptance with alacrity of the Rajasthan chief minister’s peace formula will be widely admired. Never in the history of such violent protest movements, a protesting group was too eager to grab an olive branch, even though it was predominantly at the receiving end of the state violence. Not just that. A bit of Gandhigiri was also evident; its leader sincerely apologised to the nation for the violence unleashed by the community to express its protest. It is nobody’s contention that the formula unveilded by the Government – the appointment of a commission headed by a retired Judge of the High Court – could lead to a solution which would be entirely satisfactory to the warring groups. It could at best give the Government and the stake-holders a respite from the period of madness which characterised the week-long violence which paralysed life in much of North India, and threatened to unleash a large-scale civil war involving the two dominant communities. Now that peace has returned, the focus must now be on rebuilding the social fabric in Rajasthan and elsewhere, and depoliticise the issue. Today’s story in Business Standard finally focusses on the merits of Gujjars’ demand – a point which I had tried to analyse in my earlier post. Sociologist Nandini Sundar’s article in HT here provides an academic perspective on the issue. The state Government must also act quickly, without further waste of time, in creating sub-categories within the OBC-fold, and apportion a specific percentage for Gujjars within the OBC, without waiting for the Commission’s report. In any case, inclusion in the ST list is a lengthy process, and Gujjars, like others already waiting, cannot aspire for quick decisions in their favour.
We are seeing a lot of instances in this country where violence is being used to meet demands of a community.
I wont be surprised if the Gujjar issue is used by the Supreme Court when it meets after the vacation to discuss the reservation issue. Gopal Subramanium better have something up his sleeve!!
The first part of this analysis delved into the Supreme Court’s judgment in Ashok Kumar Sharma & Ors v. Union of India, where it misread the International Rule of Law (IRoL) by focusing on...
Blurb: A petition was filed in the Supreme Court, seeking the suspension of military exports from India to Israel in light of the unfolding armed conflict in the Occupied Palestinian Territory. The...
Blurb: In his recent rejoinder, Dalmia clarifies the “expressed an opinion” standard to better define when recusal may be appropriate. He addresses the four rebuttals that the author raised and...
Blurb: In his recent rejoinder, Dalmia clarifies the “expressed an opinion” standard to better define when recusal may be appropriate. He addresses the four rebuttals that the author...
A fortnightly feature inspired by I-CONnect’s weekly “What’s New in Public Law” feature that addresses the lacuna of a one-stop-shop public law newsletter in the Indian legal...
A mass movement led by students has ushered in a new dawn in Bangladesh. What began as a claim for reform of the quota system transformed into a national movement to oust Bangladesh’s long-standing...
We are seeing a lot of instances in this country where violence is being used to meet demands of a community.
I wont be surprised if the Gujjar issue is used by the Supreme Court when it meets after the vacation to discuss the reservation issue. Gopal Subramanium better have something up his sleeve!!