In a new book published this month, “Republic of Rhetoric: Free Speech and the Constitution of India” (Penguin, 2017), I argue that the enactment of the Constitution in 1950 made little substantive difference to the right to free speech since many of the colonial-era restrictions on free speech (sedition, hate speech, obscenity, contempt of court, and defamation) were retained and even strengthened in independent India. I would like to invite interested readers to read further.
Freedom of Speech
Further reading
The LAOT Team is delighted to bring our readers a book discussion on Dr. Sameena Dalwai’s latest book, Love Jihad: A Feminist Retelling. Over the next few weeks, we have invited scholars to review...
In this piece, the author shows how the Supreme Court's minority opinion in Rojer Mathew v. South Bank India Ltd. departs from the traditional essential legislative functions standard — which...
This blog examines Assam’s 2025 executive framework for identifying and expelling alleged “illegal immigrants” under the Immigrants (Expulsion from Assam) Act, 1950. It argues that the new Standard...
The article reviews the 2025 Special Intensive Revision in Bihar and its impact on voter rolls. Large-scale deletions followed, often affecting vulnerable groups, not because of disqualification but...
Summary: In this article, I explore how emotions such as fear and empathy underlie judicial opinions in Aishat Shifa v. The State of Karnataka using Sara Ahmed’s theory of “affective economies.” By...
Summary: The article critiques the Supreme Court’s 2025 suo motu intervention on stray dogs, analysing it through constitutional principles. It argues that while the Court was justified under Article...
Read Abhinav Chandrachud book. Summary of law reports have been condensed in the para and passages. A good compliation of case laws on particular article of constitution and sections of penal code.Abhinav needs to read Willis. Original thoughts are expected rather than quotes of Jackson or Holmes.