Guest Post By Tony Anghie
early on in my career. He was the legal advisor to the Government of Nauru and later,
one of the very distinguished counsel, together with Professor Ian Brownlie and Professor James
Crawford, to appear before the International Court of Justice to successfully argue
Nauru’s Case. He had a unique role to play in the proceedings, not only because
of his expertise in international adjudication-the subject of his first major
book-but because he was involved in the dispute from the very beginning, from
the time the Nauru Commission that explored the issues surrounding the
Australian exploitation of phosphates in Nauru was created; he was instrumental in ensuring that the
Nauruan claim that was derided when it was first made, gradually assumed a
formidable legal character that could be brought before the ICJ. He also
appeared for India before the ICJ.
wrote with expertise and insight on a number of major topics of international
law including humanitarian law, space law, and the Charter of Economic Rights
and Duties of States. His works presented the position of developing states
with eloquence, rigour and a profound knowledge of the discipline. He was invited
to give the Hague Lectures, among the greatest honours bestowed upon
international lawyers, and testament to the international reputation he had won
in the field. He chose to speak and write on the always controversial topic of
Humanitarian Intervention as his subject. His erudition was immense and I was
often startled by the depth and breadth of his knowledge of international law.
No lawyer from a non-Western country has become a regular practitioner before
the ICJ, but Professor Mani had all the qualifications and expertise and
experience that would have enabled him to play this role with distinction.
President of the Asian Society of International Law in 2011. This was a duty he
undertook with a heavy heart, for it had been the hope of the whole Society
that Professor Mani’s great teacher, Professor R.P.Anand, would preside over
the biennial conference in New Delhi, but that was not to be. The task of
organizing the Conference in New Delhi was not an easy one because of various
unexpected obstacles. Professor Mani dealt with them all with his customary
dedication and his considerable diplomatic skills, and thanks to him and his
dedicated team of colleagues, the Conference was a great success. When I congratulated
him on his achievement, with tears in his eyes he mentioned what all knew, that
he had done it for his teacher. It is a shock then that he followed Professor
Anand after such a short interval and that two great Indian international lawyers
should leave us in a relatively short space of time.
gentle, kind and good humoured. His early passing is an immense loss to India
and to the world of international law. [Update: This is a link to a review of Prof Mani’s book that Prof. Anghie refers to above, and here is a link to some of Prof Mani’s recent writings for The Wire].