President’s “Assent” for Lokpal Bill’s Introduction in Rajya Sabha

Earlier this week, the government scrambled to obtain the President’s consent before the Lokpal Bill was sent to the Rajya Sabha. It was widely reported that presidential approval was necessary “because several amendments were moved in the Lok Sabha.” This explanation was both odd and misleading. Nothing in the Constitution requires presidential action just because a bill is adopted by one house of parliament with a number of amendments.

Rather, as some newspapers later reported, the President’s involvement was necessary because the Lokpal’s expenditure will be charged to the Consolidated Fund of India. Article 117 (3) of the Constitution requires the President to sign-off when a bill includes such a provision. Yet, contrary to the news reports, the President did not “assent” to the Lokpal Bill before it went to the Rajya Sabha. Presidential “assent” is only granted after a bill has been duly adopted (or deemed to have been adopted) by both houses. Rather, the President had only “recommended” that the Rajya Sabha consider the Lokpal Bill as passed by the Lok Sabha.

The Article 117 (3) requirement applies when either house of parliament (not just the Rajya Sabha) considers a bill involving Consolidated Fund expenditure. Accordingly, a Presidential recommendation had already been obtained when the government introduced the Lokpal Bill in the Lok Sabha earlier this month. Due to Article 117 (3)’s wording, a separate recommendation was necessary before the Bill could be sent to the Rajya Sabha.

Interestingly, the President’s communication to the Lok Sabha also cited Article 117 (1), which requires prior presidential recommendation for “Money Bills.” These bills are defined in Article 110 to include those involving expenditures charged to the Consolidation Fund. The reference to Article 117 (1) was omitted from the presidential recommendation to the Rajya Sabha ostensibly because, as a Money Bill, the Lokpal Bill could only be introduced in the Lok Sabha.

Join the discussion

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • Let me add a little bit more. A.117 has two types of Bills:Both Financial Bills and both have ordinary content and the A110 contents.Lokpal Bill is both for the reasons shown below: it is Type 1 because it has this `charging on CFI' part. This type of Bill has to be introduced only in the Lok Sabha and the Presidential recommendation for introduction is the rule. Type 2 it is because the passage of the Bill results in money being drawn from the CFI- two different things. The latter neeeds Presidential clearance at State 2 of the passage of the Bill in both the Houses.

    Sriram Srirangam