One of the interesting by-products of the Judges’ assets controversy is that we came to know of Justice K.Kannan’s blog. Today, most newspapers referred to him as one of those who collectively influenced the Supreme Court to agree to public declaration of Judges’ assets, although Justice Kannan’s view is in principle against it. In his latest blog post, Justice Kannan reflects on the recent case of Chandigarh Admn v. Nemo which LAOT had discussed recently. Justice Kannan defends the HC’s judgment, and wonders how Supreme Court will be able to justify its reversal of the HC’s verdict.
Justice K.Kannan on whether mentally retarded can continue pregnancy
Further reading
The first part of this analysis delved into the Supreme Court’s judgment in Ashok Kumar Sharma & Ors v. Union of India, where it misread the International Rule of Law (IRoL) by focusing on...
Blurb: A petition was filed in the Supreme Court, seeking the suspension of military exports from India to Israel in light of the unfolding armed conflict in the Occupied Palestinian Territory. The...
Blurb: In his recent rejoinder, Dalmia clarifies the “expressed an opinion” standard to better define when recusal may be appropriate. He addresses the four rebuttals that the author raised and...
Blurb: In his recent rejoinder, Dalmia clarifies the “expressed an opinion” standard to better define when recusal may be appropriate. He addresses the four rebuttals that the author...
A fortnightly feature inspired by I-CONnect’s weekly “What’s New in Public Law” feature that addresses the lacuna of a one-stop-shop public law newsletter in the Indian legal...
A mass movement led by students has ushered in a new dawn in Bangladesh. What began as a claim for reform of the quota system transformed into a national movement to oust Bangladesh’s long-standing...