One of the interesting by-products of the Judges’ assets controversy is that we came to know of Justice K.Kannan’s blog. Today, most newspapers referred to him as one of those who collectively influenced the Supreme Court to agree to public declaration of Judges’ assets, although Justice Kannan’s view is in principle against it. In his latest blog post, Justice Kannan reflects on the recent case of Chandigarh Admn v. Nemo which LAOT had discussed recently. Justice Kannan defends the HC’s judgment, and wonders how Supreme Court will be able to justify its reversal of the HC’s verdict.
Justice K.Kannan on whether mentally retarded can continue pregnancy
Further reading
Blurb: This blog discusses the inadequacy of the current refugee law framework in addressing the pressing issue of climate refugees. It subsequently discusses the imminent need to develop regional...
Blurb: This blog discusses the inadequacy of the current refugee law framework in addressing the pressing issue of climate refugees. It subsequently discusses the imminent need to develop regional...
Blurb: The Essential Religious Practices (ERP) Test is scheduled to be reviewed by the Supreme Court of India. This piece highlights the inadequacies of the ERP Doctrine, and argues for a change...
Blurb: The article advocates extending euthanasia to non-terminally ill patients, emphasizing autonomy and dignity under Article 21. Critiquing current laws, it highlights ethical dilemmas and...
In this piece, the author revisits the legacy of Bhulabhai Desai and his masterful defense at the Indian National Army Trials of 1945, exploring how Bhulabhai’s arguments not only reframed the INA’s...
The blog analyses the Mineral Area Development Authority decision, specifically analysing the question of when states can start taxing mining entities, along with an analysis of the doctrine of...