M R Madhavan, President of PRS Legislative Research, has an excellent piece in the Indian Express regarding the proposed system of judicial appointments and the importance of further debate on this vital matter. Available here.
This seems like a large loophole and worth debating and correcting. Otherwise I fear either Parliament will abuse its power to stack the JAC when it wants to push back on the judiciary or the judiciary out of fear of this outcome will read down the amendment so that we are in a similar position to which we now find ourselves. Neither position is desirable and both seem avoidable.
Hi, It is great blog. I read this post and it is very informative blog. It is very helpful for me. you are doing great job. Thanks for sharing this post. Keep Posting.
Summary: The approach to ‘transformative constitutionalism’ in Bandhua Mukti Morcha vs Union stands in stark contrast to the rationale preferred in Balram Singh. The central issue concerns both...
Summary: The piece analyses the scope of Section 175(4) of the BNSS. The provision requires a Magistrate, before directing an investigation against a public servant, to seek a report from a superior...
The article focuses on how the Constitution (One Hundred and Thirty-first Amendment) Bill, 2026, alters the foundational logic of delimitation itself. In particular, it highlights two underexplored...
The article focuses on how the Constitution (One Hundred and Thirty-first Amendment) Bill, 2026, alters the foundational logic of delimitation itself. In particular, it highlights two underexplored...
Blurb: In this article, the author critically examines the recent advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice on state obligations concerning climate change, unpacking its doctrinal...
Summary: In Murti Devi & Anr. v Balkar Singh, the Jammu & Kashmir High Court denied maintenance to a woman in a live-in relationship after considering her male-partner’s conviction for...
This seems like a large loophole and worth debating and correcting. Otherwise I fear either Parliament will abuse its power to stack the JAC when it wants to push back on the judiciary or the judiciary out of fear of this outcome will read down the amendment so that we are in a similar position to which we now find ourselves. Neither position is desirable and both seem avoidable.
Or this piece in today's Hindu:
http://www.thehindu.com/opinion/op-ed/no-better-judge-of-this-government/article5107583.ece?homepage=true
Hi,
It is great blog. I read this post and it is very informative blog. It is very helpful for me. you are doing great job. Thanks for sharing this post. Keep Posting.
The Aiello Law Firm