M R Madhavan, President of PRS Legislative Research, has an excellent piece in the Indian Express regarding the proposed system of judicial appointments and the importance of further debate on this vital matter. Available here.
This seems like a large loophole and worth debating and correcting. Otherwise I fear either Parliament will abuse its power to stack the JAC when it wants to push back on the judiciary or the judiciary out of fear of this outcome will read down the amendment so that we are in a similar position to which we now find ourselves. Neither position is desirable and both seem avoidable.
Hi, It is great blog. I read this post and it is very informative blog. It is very helpful for me. you are doing great job. Thanks for sharing this post. Keep Posting.
The first part of this analysis delved into the Supreme Court’s judgment in Ashok Kumar Sharma & Ors v. Union of India, where it misread the International Rule of Law (IRoL) by focusing on...
Blurb: A petition was filed in the Supreme Court, seeking the suspension of military exports from India to Israel in light of the unfolding armed conflict in the Occupied Palestinian Territory. The...
Blurb: In his recent rejoinder, Dalmia clarifies the “expressed an opinion” standard to better define when recusal may be appropriate. He addresses the four rebuttals that the author raised and...
Blurb: In his recent rejoinder, Dalmia clarifies the “expressed an opinion” standard to better define when recusal may be appropriate. He addresses the four rebuttals that the author...
A fortnightly feature inspired by I-CONnect’s weekly “What’s New in Public Law” feature that addresses the lacuna of a one-stop-shop public law newsletter in the Indian legal...
A mass movement led by students has ushered in a new dawn in Bangladesh. What began as a claim for reform of the quota system transformed into a national movement to oust Bangladesh’s long-standing...
This seems like a large loophole and worth debating and correcting. Otherwise I fear either Parliament will abuse its power to stack the JAC when it wants to push back on the judiciary or the judiciary out of fear of this outcome will read down the amendment so that we are in a similar position to which we now find ourselves. Neither position is desirable and both seem avoidable.
Or this piece in today's Hindu:
http://www.thehindu.com/opinion/op-ed/no-better-judge-of-this-government/article5107583.ece?homepage=true
Hi,
It is great blog. I read this post and it is very informative blog. It is very helpful for me. you are doing great job. Thanks for sharing this post. Keep Posting.
The Aiello Law Firm