Uncategorized

Announcement: Seminar on Litigating Health Rights: Can Courts Bring Justice to Health?

Add comment29 January 20141 min readby Namita Wahi

Written by Namita Wahi

The Centre for Policy Research is delighted to invite you to a seminar on

Litigating the Right to Health: Can Courts Bring Justice to Health?

Speakers: Professor Siri Gloppen and Namita Wahi

Date: Thursday, 30 January 2014

Time: 11:30 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. (lunch will be provided)

Venue: Conference Room, Centre for Policy Research, Dharma Marg,

Chanakyapuri, New Delhi – 110021

Please RSVP by filling out the this form. In case of questions, please email [email protected]

Facebook Twitter Reddit LinkedIn

Written by

Namita Wahi

Join the discussion Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

What You Said as You Refused to Speak: Supreme Court of India’s Dismissal of Petition to Halt Military Exports to Israel – Part II

4 December 2024by Garvit Shrivastava and Adithi Rajesh

The first part of this analysis delved into the Supreme Court’s judgment in Ashok Kumar Sharma & Ors v. Union of India, where it misread the International Rule of Law (IRoL) by focusing on...

Uncategorized

What You Said as You Refused to Speak: Supreme Court of India’s Dismissal of Petition to Halt Military Exports to Israel – Part I

4 December 2024by Garvit Shrivastava and Adithi Rajesh

Blurb: A petition was filed in the Supreme Court, seeking the suspension of military exports from India to Israel in light of the unfolding armed conflict in the Occupied Palestinian Territory. The...

Uncategorized

Recusal Long Written – A Reply to Anshul Dalmia’s Rejoinder on Intellectual Bias – Part II

4 December 2024by Sarthak Sahoo

Blurb: In his recent rejoinder, Dalmia clarifies the “expressed an opinion” standard to better define when recusal may be appropriate. He addresses the four rebuttals that the author raised and...

Uncategorized

Recusals Long Written – A Reply to Anshul Dalmia’s Rejoinder on Intellectual Bias – Part I

4 December 2024by Sarthak Sahoo

Blurb: In his recent rejoinder, Dalmia clarifies the “expressed an opinion” standard to better define when recusal may be appropriate. He addresses the four rebuttals that the author...

Lately in Public Law Uncategorized

Lately in Public Law | September ‘24

17 October 2024by LAOT Team

A fortnightly feature inspired by I-CONnect’s weekly “What’s New in Public Law” feature that addresses the lacuna of a one-stop-shop public law newsletter in the Indian legal...

Uncategorized

Democracy in Bangladesh: Ouster of an Autocrat and an Uncertain Future – Part III

1 September 2024by Cynthia Farid

A mass movement led by students has ushered in a new dawn in Bangladesh. What began as a claim for reform of the quota system transformed into a national movement to oust Bangladesh’s long-standing...

Announcement: Seminar on Litigating Health Rights: Can Courts Bring Justice to Health?

Namita Wahi

Join the discussion Cancel reply

Further reading

What You Said as You Refused to Speak: Supreme Court of India’s Dismissal of Petition to Halt Military Exports to Israel – Part II

What You Said as You Refused to Speak: Supreme Court of India’s Dismissal of Petition to Halt Military Exports to Israel – Part I

Recusal Long Written – A Reply to Anshul Dalmia’s Rejoinder on Intellectual Bias – Part II

Recusals Long Written – A Reply to Anshul Dalmia’s Rejoinder on Intellectual Bias – Part I

Lately in Public Law | September ‘24

Democracy in Bangladesh: Ouster of an Autocrat and an Uncertain Future – Part III

Menu