As a follow-up to Venkatesan’s “live blogging” from the Supreme Court, my friend, Gopal Sankaranarayan, has been kind to send me an outline of the arguments by KK Venugopal and FS Nariman in this epic case. I thought it would be useful reading for those following Venkatesan’s posts. All the submissions are in one page (so don’t be mislead by Google’s pagination).
Resident Doctors Association Case (Mandal-II): KKV and Nariman Submissions
Further reading
The first part of this analysis delved into the Supreme Court’s judgment in Ashok Kumar Sharma & Ors v. Union of India, where it misread the International Rule of Law (IRoL) by focusing on...
Blurb: A petition was filed in the Supreme Court, seeking the suspension of military exports from India to Israel in light of the unfolding armed conflict in the Occupied Palestinian Territory. The...
Blurb: In his recent rejoinder, Dalmia clarifies the “expressed an opinion” standard to better define when recusal may be appropriate. He addresses the four rebuttals that the author raised and...
Blurb: In his recent rejoinder, Dalmia clarifies the “expressed an opinion” standard to better define when recusal may be appropriate. He addresses the four rebuttals that the author...
A fortnightly feature inspired by I-CONnect’s weekly “What’s New in Public Law” feature that addresses the lacuna of a one-stop-shop public law newsletter in the Indian legal...
A mass movement led by students has ushered in a new dawn in Bangladesh. What began as a claim for reform of the quota system transformed into a national movement to oust Bangladesh’s long-standing...
Vikram, I am only able to see the first page of the two documents (which the footnote seems to indicate has 8 pages and 6 pages respectively). Could you pls re-post these documents.
I reaffrim the above issue, the rest of the pages after page 1 seem to be not loading.
There is only one page. Ignore the Page details at the bottom.