Of course with lawyers like Mr.Arun Jaitley appearing for News Corp and then also presiding over the ministry he was supposed to fight against News Corp in courts, making time to meet the ‘former client’ Mr.Murdoch in Waldorf Astoria in New York, does make things easier, does it not?
The first part of this analysis delved into the Supreme Court’s judgment in Ashok Kumar Sharma & Ors v. Union of India, where it misread the International Rule of Law (IRoL) by focusing on...
Blurb: A petition was filed in the Supreme Court, seeking the suspension of military exports from India to Israel in light of the unfolding armed conflict in the Occupied Palestinian Territory. The...
Blurb: In his recent rejoinder, Dalmia clarifies the “expressed an opinion” standard to better define when recusal may be appropriate. He addresses the four rebuttals that the author raised and...
Blurb: In his recent rejoinder, Dalmia clarifies the “expressed an opinion” standard to better define when recusal may be appropriate. He addresses the four rebuttals that the author...
A fortnightly feature inspired by I-CONnect’s weekly “What’s New in Public Law” feature that addresses the lacuna of a one-stop-shop public law newsletter in the Indian legal...
A mass movement led by students has ushered in a new dawn in Bangladesh. What began as a claim for reform of the quota system transformed into a national movement to oust Bangladesh’s long-standing...
Was it because:
“He said that News Corp. has taken two cases to the Indian supreme court and has won both times.”
Wonder what his reaction might have been if News Corp. had lost. Sorry – can’t help being cynical about this.
Of course with lawyers like Mr.Arun Jaitley appearing for News Corp and then also presiding over the ministry he was supposed to fight against News Corp in courts, making time to meet the ‘former client’ Mr.Murdoch in Waldorf Astoria in New York, does make things easier, does it not?