The Jindal Global Law Review is out with the first part of a special double issue on Law, Culture, and Queer Politics in Neoliberal Times. Several of the contributions focus their attention on the Naz Foundation judgment, while others look at queer politics more broadly in India and elsewhere. Contributors include Ratna Kapur, Brenda Cossman, and Ashley Tellis amongst others.
Law, Culture, and Queer Politics in Neoliberal Times
Further reading
Summary: The article analyses the case of Hari Devageeth v Union of India. It highlights the conflict faced by the court between two constitutional rights: a transgender man’s right to bodily...
Introduction The fifth panel highlighted the multi-faceted dimensions of behavioural accountability within the Indian Judicial system. Moving beyond the constitutional frameworks, the panelists...
Introduction This report summarises the panel discussion titled “Adjudicating the Environmental Juristocracy,” which examined the trajectory of environmental and animal law jurisprudence...
Introduction The panel paid tribute to Professor M.P. Singh by showcasing his academic work, his role as head of NUJS, and his ability to unite diverse groups in legal education. Dr. Satya Prasoon...
This report summarises the panel discussion on the topic “Special Intensive Revision: Contours and Contents of Citizenship”, during the 7th Edition of the Courts and the Constitution Conference at...
Introduction This panel examined the intersection of constitutional text, institutional practice, and judicial intervention, focusing specifically on the controversies surrounding the exercise of...
I am not sure if this is a right place to ask this, but it would be very helpful if someone could do a write up on the Office of CAG. Since, may of the bloggers here are students of Constitutional Law if not experts, they can better comment on what exactly does the Constitution allows the CAG to do. With each finding of CAG being dismissed as an aberration from Constitutional mandate, it would be very helpful.