The Jindal Global Law Review is out with the first part of a special double issue on Law, Culture, and Queer Politics in Neoliberal Times. Several of the contributions focus their attention on the Naz Foundation judgment, while others look at queer politics more broadly in India and elsewhere. Contributors include Ratna Kapur, Brenda Cossman, and Ashley Tellis amongst others.
Law, Culture, and Queer Politics in Neoliberal Times
Further reading
The first part of this analysis delved into the Supreme Court’s judgment in Ashok Kumar Sharma & Ors v. Union of India, where it misread the International Rule of Law (IRoL) by focusing on...
Blurb: A petition was filed in the Supreme Court, seeking the suspension of military exports from India to Israel in light of the unfolding armed conflict in the Occupied Palestinian Territory. The...
Blurb: In his recent rejoinder, Dalmia clarifies the “expressed an opinion” standard to better define when recusal may be appropriate. He addresses the four rebuttals that the author raised and...
Blurb: In his recent rejoinder, Dalmia clarifies the “expressed an opinion” standard to better define when recusal may be appropriate. He addresses the four rebuttals that the author...
A fortnightly feature inspired by I-CONnect’s weekly “What’s New in Public Law” feature that addresses the lacuna of a one-stop-shop public law newsletter in the Indian legal...
A mass movement led by students has ushered in a new dawn in Bangladesh. What began as a claim for reform of the quota system transformed into a national movement to oust Bangladesh’s long-standing...
I am not sure if this is a right place to ask this, but it would be very helpful if someone could do a write up on the Office of CAG. Since, may of the bloggers here are students of Constitutional Law if not experts, they can better comment on what exactly does the Constitution allows the CAG to do. With each finding of CAG being dismissed as an aberration from Constitutional mandate, it would be very helpful.