Summary: The article critiques the Supreme Court’s 2025 suo motu intervention on stray dogs, analysing it through constitutional principles. It argues that while the Court was justified under Article...
This piece argues that India’s euthanasia framework rests on an illusory autonomy that does not meaningfully exist and contends that the State must guarantee access to minimally adequate palliative...
Summary: This piece argues that India’s euthanasia framework rests on an illusory autonomy that does not meaningfully exist and contends that the State must guarantee access to minimally adequate...
Summary: This article traces the evolution of India’s enemy property regime from Partition-era custodianship to the 2017 Amendment’s permanent confiscation model. It argues that extending “enemy”...
This new LAOT series seeks to demystify High Court procedure for young lawyers, litigants, and law students entering the profession. Through court-specific installments focused on different High...
A fortnightly feature inspired by I-CONnect’s weekly “What’s New in Public Law” feature that addresses the lacuna of a one-stop-shop public law newsletter in the Indian legal...
It is widely accepted that public law has a significant influence on the way individuals live. Through the Lived Realities Series, we explore how it does so. We invite authors who live the realities...
The piece proposes that non-voting state appointed members to Rajya Sabha will enhance its role as a federal house that is also meant to serve as a house of expertise.
The piece argues that the Indian SC judgments in the stray dogs matter was not an exception but a reflection of the larger Indian jurisprudence on animal rights that is anthropocentric, and views...
This piece examines how India’s Online Gaming Act, 2025 challenges the country’s federal balance by using the internet as a pretext for central regulation raising urgent questions about the future of...