Law and Other Things

This post analyses the Supreme Court’s attempt to reconcile its dominant liberalism/individualism based approach towards fundamental rights as against the group right claims under Article 26, in the recent Sabarimala verdict.

In this post, Vivek Anandh thematically analyses the important doctrinal conclusions on the ‘Essential Practices’ test and its discursive impact on the constitutional jurisprudence in the context of the Sabarimala Judgment.

In this post, the authors argue that while the Navtej Johar judgment is tool for social change, it may be unable to function as an effective measure for social acceptance.

This post is the concluding part of a three part series deconstructing the Sabrimala Verdict which opened the gates of temple to women devotees.

This post is the second part of a three part series deconstructing the Sabarimala Verdict which opened the gates of temple to women devotees.

This post is the first part of a three part series deconstructing the Sabrimala Verdict which opened the gates of temple to women devotees.

This blog post outlines the potential impacts of divergence in the recent 2018 Indian Arbitration Bill passed by the Lower House of the Parliament from the recommendations of a High-Level Committee constituted by the government.

Law and Other Things

Sabarimala and the Essential Religious Practices Test

Social Dimensions Of Judicial Decisions: The Navtej Johar Template

Understanding the Sabarimala Verdict- Part II

Understanding the Sabarimala Verdict- Part I

How Far Does The 2018 Indian Arbitration Bill Go In Realizing The Vision Of Srikrishna Committee?