Brief notes: Impunity Report, Madras HC on individual autonomy, Dialogic Judicial Review

A few legal developments/opinions worth noting:

1. Human Rights Watch released its report on August 4th, titled ‘Broken System: Dysfunction, Abuse and Impunity in the Indian Police‘. The report comprehensively documents the human rights that Indian police abuses with impunity. Bibek Debroy calls for urgent police reforms in light of the report. The issue of impunity has been discussed on this blog previously (I, II and III).

2. The Madras High Court has held in Influence Lifestyle Stores v. Government of Tamil Nadu that spas offering massage by opposite-sex masseurs are not engaging in any illegal activity. Holding that ‘majoritarian impulses rooted in moralistic tradition cannot impinge upon individual autonomy’, the judgment has clear echoes of Naz Foundation. That both these champions of individual autonomy rely heavily on Anuj Garg is no surprise.

3. Abinav Chandrachud’s opinion on dialogic judicial activism is very interesting. Jeff King mentions something similar in this article:

the metaphor of institutional or democratic dialogue between courts, the executive and Parliament. On this view, courts take part in an iterative process within which all branches of government contribute to sound decision-making. (p. 428)

One comment

  1. Thanks for posting this.A related but less discussed topic is the state of affairs at the subordinate court level.It will be interesting and useful if this blog could discuss the key obstacles plaguing the lower judiciary.Particularly the role of state governments and Higher Judiciary in particular. Is the situation uniformly bad or some states are doing better than others?
    Is it true that a person can be appointed a Judge and get bail through the influence of State ministers.Also,that Judges want and have suceeded in keeping the post of Judge among their blood relatives only.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.